Juvenile dementia

I'd like to tell you, but I'm not allowed

Poor old Jemima Khan. First she gets saddled with the name of one of the Play School toys (although it could be worse of course - Hambel Khan anyone?), now she's the victim of rumours that she's taken out a super injuction.

And it's worse than that. Supposedly the injuction is to prevent the publication of photographs of her in a compromising situation with... wait for it... wait for it... Jeremy Clarkson!

Good Lord, no wonder she's upset.

"Jemima Khan described weekend rumours that she has taken out a gagging order preventing "intimate photos" of herself and Jeremy Clarkson being published as a "bloody nightmare"."

Frankly, this can only be a heroic understatement, as I'd describe even seeing photos of Clarkson naked and on the job as a bloody nightmare.

And if you were actually with him, you'd have to endure not only the commentary ("the body is exquisite, great in the curves, she's a romantic ideal... with great tits."), but he'd no doubt want James May and the Hamster to have a go too.

Needless to say, I don't believe a word of it, due to having seen her, then taken a look at him. That's all it takes folks.

Still, it does rather reveal a fun aspect of the super injuction, as we can now make up any rumour we like, however absurd, and then claim they've taken out a super injunction to hide the terrible truth.

Like that video of me and Christina Aguilera in the hot tub.

For my part, I'm looking forward to the development of the mega injuction. It's like a superinjunction, but even the person who takes it out is not allowed to know what they've done.

But maybe they do exist already. Maybe I've taken one out myself. Maybe the paperwork is followed up with a dose of flashy-thing in a Men In Black style.

Who knows what I might have been up to?

No, wait, that's just heavy drinking isn't it?

posted by Peter The Great @ 7:46 PM